

Opponents argue that safe havens may encourage illegal drug use and re-direct funding from traditional treatment centers. Proponents argue that the safe havens are the only proven solution to lower the overdose fatality rate and prevent the spread of diseases like HIV-AIDS.

Since 2001 5,900 people have overdosed at a safe haven in Sydney, Australia but no one has died. The safe havens reduce the overdose death rate by insuring the addicted patients are given drugs that are not contaminated or poisoned. To combat the epidemic cities including Vancouver, BC and Sydney, AUS opened safe havens where addicts can inject drugs under the supervision of medical professionals. are caused by the opioid class of drugs which includes prescription painkillers, heroin and fentanyl. from drug overdoses - a 21% increase from 2015. city of Philadelphia city proposed opening a “safe haven” in an effort to combat the city's heroin epidemic. Should cities open drug “safe havens” where people who are addicted to illegal drugs can use them under the supervision of medical professionals? Proponents argue that the arcane law disenfranchises millions of Americans from participating in democracy and has an adverse affect on poor communities. Opponents of felon voting rights argue that a citizen forfeits their rights to vote when they are convicted of a felony. approximately 5.8 million people are ineligible to vote due to voter disenfranchisement and only two states, Maine and Vermont, have no restrictions on allowing felons to vote.

The 14th amendment of the United States prohibits citizens from voting who have participated in a “rebellion, or other crime” but allows states to determine which crimes qualify for voter disenfranchisement. The order overturned the state’s practice of felony disenfranchisement, which excludes people from voting who have been convicted of a criminal defense. In April 2016, Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe issued an executive order which restored voting rights to more than 200,000 convicted felons living in the state. Should convicted criminals have the right to vote? Proponents argue that the jobs and tax revenue created by the companies eventually offset the cost of any awarded incentives. The European Union has strict laws which prevent member cities from bidding against each other with state aid (tax incentives) in an effort to lure private companies. Opponents argue that governments should spend the tax revenue on public projects instead and that the federal government should pass laws banning tax incentives. For the Arlington, VA headquarters the city and state governments gave Amazon $500 million in tax breaks. For the New York City headquarters the city and state governments gave Amazon $2.8 billion in tax credits and construction grants. More than 200 cities applied and offered Amazon millions of dollars in economic incentives and tax breaks. Amazon said the company could invest over $5 billion and the offices would create up to 50,000 high paying jobs. The announcement came a year after the company announced it would accept proposals from any North American city who wanted to host the headquarters. In November 2018 the online e-commerce company Amazon announced it would be building a second headquarters in New York City and Arlington, VA. I did also read their manifesto last go around, watch their farce of a parliament (and government) fairly often and definitely no, even if you took out the leaving the UK bit (even if it is a burden on the rest of the UK).Should cities be allowed to offer private companies economic incentives to relocate? Completely and utterly no even if I was to be dragged kicking and screaming back to Scotland and be compelled to live there. On the other hand it said I might be inclined to vote for the SNP, which. Looking at the map also seemingly surrounded by like minded individuals and then not so much, which is somewhat odd having spoken to many people from those locations and looking at historical voting patterns. I am sure that is a shocking turn of events. Still a filthy centrist, though more towards whatever passes for libertarian in the UK, that likes people to rise on their own merits, does not care for religion, likes science and likes not seeing people dying in the street because they can't afford a few pills. Some questions and answers phrased oddly such that I might wish to revise things. Click to expand.Did that one too, even carried over some answers which was nice.
